Featured image of post Market Madness: Meta vs Google

Market Madness: Meta vs Google

Meta outpacing Google? Sure just like Blockbuster outpaced Netflix Market logic is on vacation again facepalm

TL;DR

Google’s solid profits and strong moat are ignored as Meta, with less revenue and diversification, gains in market cap. This echoes past market bubbles where hype trumps fundamentals—a dangerous game for investors.

Story

The Market’s Delusion: Why Google’s Value Defies Logic

John, a seasoned investor, watched in disbelief as Meta’s market cap crept closer to Google’s. It made no sense. Google, the advertising behemoth, raked in significantly more profit. Its diversification was minimal, a stark contrast to Google’s sprawling empire. Yet, the market favored the one-trick pony.

This isn’t a new story. Remember the dot-com bubble? Irrational exuberance fueled valuations based on narratives, not fundamentals. Like a house of cards built on hype, the market ignored glaring red flags. Google’s discounted price-to-earnings ratio hinted at underlying concerns – antitrust lawsuits, fears of AI disruption, and a “boring” CEO.

The market, however, seemed to live in a fantasy. It overlooked Google’s consistent profits, dismissing its moat as if search was yesterday’s news. This reminds us of 2008, when complex mortgage-backed securities disguised toxic assets. Today, complex algorithms mask a simple truth: market sentiment can be dangerously detached from reality.

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E): A valuation metric that compares a company’s stock price to its earnings per share. A lower P/E can suggest undervaluation, but it can also signal market skepticism about future growth.

Market Capitalization: The total value of a company’s outstanding shares. Calculated by multiplying the current stock price by the number of shares.

Moat: A company’s competitive advantage that protects it from rivals. Think brand loyalty (Apple), network effects (Facebook), or proprietary technology (Google).

The market, like a fickle gambler, chased the shiny new toy (Meta) while ignoring the reliable workhorse (Google). History teaches us that such irrationality doesn’t last. The question is, who will be left holding the bag when the music stops?

Advice

Don’t let FOMO blind you. Research fundamentals—revenue, profit, competitive advantages. Ignore market hype. History shows us ignoring the basics usually ends badly.

Source

https://www.reddit.com/r/stocks/comments/1iickrt/meta_going_to_surpass_goog_in_market_cap_by_eoy/

Made with the laziness 🦥
by a busy guy