Featured image of post Trumps Trade War: Deja Vu All Over Again

Trumps Trade War: Deja Vu All Over Again

Trumps latest trade war tantrum? 35 tariffs on Canada Remember 2008? This is dj vu all over again only with maple syrup instead of subprime mortgages Enjoy the higher prices

TL;DR

Trump’s 35% tariff on Canadian imports is a protectionist measure rooted in dubious claims, harming both Canadian and American consumers. It’s a textbook example of how easily impulsive leadership can trigger economic instability, mirroring past crises.

Story

Another day, another Trumpian tantrum. This time, Canada is in the crosshairs, facing a 35% tariff on its exports to the US. Sounds familiar? It should. This is classic protectionism, a tactic as old as trade itself, cloaked in the flimsy excuse of combating the fentanyl crisis and trade imbalances.

How did this happen? Trump, citing (dubious) claims about Canada’s role in the opioid crisis and Canada’s dairy policies, simply announced the tariffs. No complex legislation, no economic debate – just a presidential decree. Think of it as a trade war started by tweet. This is the same type of impulsive, uninformed action that led to many previous economic downturns. It completely ignores the reality that trade deficits exist due to a complex interplay of market forces that are not easily solved with arbitrary tariffs.

Who suffers? Canadian businesses, their employees, and consumers who will see higher prices. But this isn’t limited to Canada. The ripple effects of this kind of protectionism extend to US consumers, who will pay more for Canadian goods. Remember the 2008 financial crisis? Many of these same policies, combined with lax regulations, played a big role in that disaster. In the long run, protectionist measures generally hurt the national economy more than they help.

What can we learn? Be wary of populist leaders who promise simple solutions to complex problems. Trade wars rarely benefit anyone in the long run. And just like the Enron scandal showed us, opaque decision-making and lack of transparency are warning signs of potential economic disaster. If a leader’s words seem too simple to be true, they probably are. Remember to stay critical.

In conclusion, this episode demonstrates how easily impulsive decisions by those in power can disrupt markets and hurt ordinary people. The economic consequences will likely linger for some time, mirroring the way the 2008 financial crisis is still causing problems today. The real tragedy is that this kind of economic warfare is so predictable, yet we keep falling for it.

Advice

Don’t believe promises of easy economic fixes. Be skeptical of populist leaders and understand that trade wars hurt everyone in the long run.

Source

https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/1lwsy1f/trump_announces_35_tariffs_on_canada/

Made with the laziness 🦥
by a busy guy